top of page
Search

Still Learning: Reflections From the Therapy Room


Lately, I’ve found myself thinking:


The people I work with are my greatest teachers.


Across my NHS role, my private practice, supervision spaces, Communities of Practice, and training work there’s a thread emerging.


A set of lessons that feel less like “new knowledge” and more like a deepening, sense making and connection building.


Here are some of the things I’m learning (and relearning).




Regulation Changes Everything


I keep being reminded that capacity is state-dependent.


I see it in adults who can articulate their needs beautifully when regulated, or feeling safe enough to access their language and who lose access to language, sequencing, or perspective when overwhelmed.


I see it in teenagers who are described as “oppositional” when exhausted.


I see it in therapists who doubt their competence when what’s really happening is burnout.


The more I work in neurodivergent-affirming ways, the more obvious this becomes:


When sensory load increases, predictability decreases, and social expectations rise; cognition shifts.

This isn’t lack of insight. It isn’t lack of motivation. It isn’t “non-compliance.” It’s a nervous system doing its job.


And if that’s true, then our interventions have to begin with safety, predictability, and co-regulation, not behaviour management.


People Know More Than We Think They Do


In supervision and client work alike, I’m sitting with this question:


Whose knowledge are we centring?

I’m increasingly aware of how easy it is for professional language to override lived experience.


Clients describe “screaming inside,” parents describe “walking on eggshells,” therapists describe “something not sitting right.”


These are not vague impressions. They are lived experience. If we rush to translate them into diagnostic shorthand, risk frameworks, or service pathways too quickly, we risk committing epistemic injustice; subtly positioning ourselves as more credible knowers of someone’s internal world than they are.


I’m learning to slow down.


To treat narrative as evidence.


To hold lived experience as primary data, not anecdote.


Behaviour Makes Sense in Context


Whether I’m in an MDT meeting, writing a report, or sitting with a supervisee, I’m constantly reminded that behaviour only becomes confusing when we strip it of context.


When we reintroduce:

  • sensory processing

  • monotropism

  • trauma history

  • attachment dynamics

  • systemic marginalisation

  • racialised or gendered expectations

  • executive functioning differences


…what once looked chaotic often becomes coherent.


The more we zoom out, the less pathologising we need to do.

Scripts Are Not Inauthentic — They’re Strategic


In recent conversations (with clients and therapists alike) and my own personal reflections of my own processing needs, scripting keeps coming up.


Scripting to advocate.

Scripting to set boundaries.

Scripting to survive meetings.

Scripting to access services.


I’m increasingly seeing scripting not as masking, but as access:


As emotional labour.

As strategy.


As a form of resistance in systems that privilege quick verbal processing and neurotypical spontaneity.

When someone asks for help drafting an email, preparing a meeting script, or rehearsing language, that’s not dependency. It's scaffolding autonomy.


Standardisation vs Individualisation Is a Live Tension


In service development conversations, templates, pilot projects, documentation frameworks, I keep noticing a friction:


We need consistency.

We need efficiency.

We need governance.


And.


We need nuance.

We need formulation.

We need space for autistic-centred frameworks.


This isn’t a problem to “solve.” More a tension to navigate.


If we standardise without critical reflection, we risk embedding ableism at scale. If we individualise without structure, we risk inequity and burnout.

The work, I think, is developing shared scaffolds that are flexible enough to hold difference.


Leadership Is Relational, Not Positional


Having stepped in and out of leadership roles over the past year, I’m learning that leadership isn’t about hierarchy.


It’s about:

  • Psychological safety

  • Naming the dissonance others feel

  • Integrating neurodivergent frameworks into mainstream practice

  • Gently challenging without shaming

  • Holding complexity without collapsing into certainty


Some of the most powerful leadership moments I’ve witnessed recently haven’t been loud or authoritative.


They’ve been someone saying:


“I don’t think this makes sense when we look at it through a sensory lens.”

Or:

“Can we consider the autistic processing style here?”

Or:

“What might be happening in this person’s nervous system?”

That’s leadership too.


Burnout Is Often a Values Clash


In both my NHS and private work, I’m seeing how often distress isn’t just about workload.


It’s about moral and cognitive dissonance.


About being asked to work in ways that don’t align with your understanding of justice.

About knowing more about neurodivergence than the systems you’re operating within.

About holding awareness of systemic inequities without structural power to shift them.


When therapists are exhausted, I’m increasingly asking:

Is this capacity? Or is this conscience?

The Work Is Structural


Finally and perhaps most importantly, I’m reminded daily that this isn’t just about individual support.


It’s about structures.


If we only respond to crisis moments, we miss the architecture that produces them.

If we only focus on “coping skills,” we miss environmental overwhelm.


If we only look at individual regulation, we miss systemic dysregulation.


The people I work with keep teaching me this:


Their struggles make sense.

Their adaptations are intelligent.

Their distress is contextual.


Our job is not to normalise them into systems that harm them.


It’s to help reshape the systems.

Closing Reflections


If you’ve worked with me recently, in therapy, supervision, consultation, or training, you’ve shaped these reflections.


You’ve reminded me that:

  • Lived experience is expertise.

  • Regulation is foundational.

  • Language carries power.

  • Systems matter.


And that neurodivergent people are not problems to be solved, but humans navigating environments that often weren’t built with them in mind.


I’m grateful for the learning. Always.



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page